New numbers pose new questions...
Saturday, February 25, 2012
I found out this week that the Multiplex surplus wasn't $609276 as was reported to Council. It is unofficially $710000 at the end of December.
Councillor Coleman in one of our meetings indicated that the $609276 surplus was "mythical". Now that the Multiplex Operating Board has reported at their meeting that it was actually $710000, I wonder if my colleague would consider rephrasing that comment.
This amount of money, kept by the Operating Board, is equivalent to approximately 3.71% in taxes. City Administration indicated in our budget reports that $191205 was equal to 1% tax increase. With the operating budget increase currently sitting at 3.92% increase once the Bylaw is passed, we would be close to a 0 tax increase. (3.92 less 3.71 = 0.21)
Sadly, three members of City Council hold a position on the facility's operating board and they believe a 3.92% increase in your taxes is warranted. I tried to argue that because the Province had increased revenue sharing by 9.5% we may have been able to achieve a decrease. Further to the proposed 3.92% increase, if the Province decides to use the 2011 census numbers versus the 2006 numbers, Moose Jaw will possibly lose some of the revenue sharing projected in the operating budget. You see, if as a city you didn't grow more than the average, you lose some of your revenue sharing. Moose Jaw didn't grow more than the average. Therefore, your taxes may even go up further depending on the Province's decision of which census numbers to use.
The Operating Budget is not official yet. It cannot be passed by Bylaw until the Capital Budget is completed. The Cities Act indicates:
"Adoption of budgets
128(1) A council shall adopt an operating and a capital budget for each financial year.
(2) No council shall pass a property tax bylaw with respect to a financial year unless it has adopted the operating and capital budgets for that year."
So the correct thing for this Council to do in my opinion is to revisit the Operating Budget if our revenue sharing numbers decrease. Taxpayers should know exactly what the tax increase will be. We will soon see if that is what Council decides to do. All indications in a brief discussion we had about this issue last Monday is that it may be gobbled up in the accumulated surplus. I disagree with that.
I believe I wrote a post earlier about accountability and transparency. No wonder so many people are not interested in politics at any level. I think they are tired of the same old same old.
Stay tuned...
Executive and Capital Budget meetings commence at 6:30pm, 27 February in the Scoop Lewry Room, City Hall.
On the Executive Meeting agenda:
One item - Northeast Concept Plan - Phase 1 Enironmentalv Study and GeoTechnical Survey
On the Budget Committee Meeting agenda:
Main item - O.Serv-7 New Hospital Funding Additional Information




